Phylogeny of Palaeozoic “nautiloid” cephalopods

The oldest cephalopods in the fossil record are of late Cambrian age (about 490 mya). During the Early and Middle Ordovician, they experienced a rapid diversification, where many groups classically considered as belonging to the subclass Nautiloidea appeared. This radiation in combination with a general scarcity of characters and widespread homoplasies made it difficult to figure out evolutionary pathways. A long series of authors proposed differing hypotheses, based on which characters they considered most significant (e.g., King & Evans 2019; Pohle et al. 2022). However, none of the previous attempts used phylogenetic analysis to corroborate their hypotheses, which was one of the main objectives of my PhD project.

With this goal, we assembled a large morphological character matrix of Cambrian and Ordovician cephalopods based on an extensive literature survey and first-hand observations on specimens in museum collections. We then analysed the results using state-of-the-art methods of Bayesian phylogenetic inference to reconstruct their evolutionary relationships. The results showed that although there were large uncertainties, three major clades of early Palaeozoic cephalopods could be identified (Pohle et al. 2022):

  • Endoceratoidea: Bisonoceratida, Endoceratida
  • Multiceratoidea: Ascoceratida, Cyrtocerinida, Discosorida, Oncoceratida, Tarphyceratida
  • Orthoceratoidea: Actinoceratida, Dissidoceratida, Lituitida, Orthoceratida, Pseudorthoceratida, Rioceratida

The orders Ellesmeroceratida, Plectronoceratida and Yanheceratida were recovered at the base of the cephalopod tree, with some members (especially ellesmeroceratids) being distributed among the early branches of the other clades. The relationships between the various groups is shown in Fig. 1. Note that in contrast to the publication, I here use the proposed endings of the orders for the upcoming revised Treatise (see King & Evans 2019).

Early cephalopod phylogeny
Fig. 1. Simplified phylogeny of early Palaeozoic cephalopods. From Pohle et al. (2022), reconstructions by Evelyn Friesenbichler.

Importantly, the phylogeny shows that the common assignment of these early cephalopods to the Nautiloidea is incorrect. The origin of the living Nautilus lineage is not entirely clear, and it may either lie within the Orthoceratoidea or Multiceratoidea, while the living coleoids are firmly derived from the orthoceratoids (Pohle et al. 2022). Consequently, the Palaeozoic “nautiloids” encompasses crown and stem cephalopods, stem nautiloids, and even stem coleoids. From an evolutionary perspective, the term “nautiloid” in this broad sense has thus little value and should be used with caution. Personally, I prefer restricting it to the order Nautilida only, until we get a better understanding of its origin, and therefore the exact extent of the cephalopod crown and stem group.

Besides this major study, I have also been involved in smaller studies on the phylogeny of smaller groups of Palaeozoic cephalopods, applying simpler parsimony methods (Fang et al. 2019; Kröger & Pohle 2021).

References

Fang, X., Pohle, A., Kröger, B., Aubrechtová, M., Burrett, C., Zhang, Y. & Zhang, Y. (2021). Phylogeny of Middle-Late Ordovician lituitid cephalopods based on cladistic analysis. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 19(9), 633–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2021.1944354

King, A.H. & Evans, D.H. (2019). High-level classification of the nautiloid cephalopods: a proposal for the revision of the Treatise Part K. Swiss Journal of Palaeontology, 138(1), 65-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13358-019-00186-4

Kröger, B. & Pohle, A. (2021). Early-Middle Ordovician cephalopods from Ny Friesland, Spitsbergen - a pelagic fauna with Laurentian affinities. European Journal of Taxonomy, 783(1), 1–102. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.783.1601

Pohle, A., Kröger, B., Warnock, R.C.M., King, A.H., Evans, D.H., Aubrechtová, M., Cichowolski, M., Fang, X. & Klug, C. (2022). Early cephalopod evolution clarified through Bayesian phylogenetic inference. BMC Biology, 20, 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-022-01284-5